MaintTrack PRO connects physical assets, maintenance plans, technicians, field activities, photographs, location records, supervisor approvals and client reporting in one controlled operational workflow.
Built to support Gharib Gulf's maintenance, well-integrity and field-service operations.

Maintenance Control Center dashboard — illustrative data, does not reflect actual operational data.
Operational Workflow
Create a structured digital record for each asset, including identification, location, technical information and service history.
Define inspections, preventive-maintenance activities, checklists, schedules and operational priorities.
Create and assign controlled work orders with clear scope, dates, assets, crews and required evidence.
Allow technicians and field teams to record completed activities, observations, findings and actions taken.
Connect GPS-supported records, before-and-after photographs, checklists, documents and timestamps to the activity.
Review execution quality, identify missing evidence, return incomplete records and approve completed work.
Generate clear operational summaries, maintenance records, KPI dashboards and bilingual reports.

Work Order Control screen — illustrative data, does not reflect actual operational data.
Platform Capabilities
Operational Benefits
Understand what assets exist, where they are and what maintenance activity has been performed.
Connect every task to its assigned team, execution record, evidence and review status.
Maintain a structured history from asset registration through work execution and final approval.
Identify missing photographs, location information, checklists or approvals before client handover.
Convert structured field records into consistent operational and management reports.
Provide a controlled digital record supporting maintenance scope, progress reviews and client communication.
Role-Based Experience
High-level operational visibility, trends, outstanding issues and reporting.
Organization setup, users, assets, work planning and operational controls.
Review completed activities, validate evidence, manage exceptions and approve records.
Access assigned work, complete checklists and record field evidence.
View authorized reports, asset history and approved operational information within the agreed scope.
Access and visibility are configured according to the organisation, assigned role and contract requirements.
Evidence & Control
MaintTrack PRO brings execution records and supporting evidence together. Supervisors can identify missing GPS records, photographs, findings, approvals or closeout information before work is treated as complete.
Evidence Status — Illustrative
Values shown are illustrative and do not expose client operational data.

Field Evidence and Approval screen — illustrative data, does not reflect actual operational data.
Applications
The following scenarios illustrate how MaintTrack PRO addresses documented field-operations challenges through structured, traceable workflows. All examples are anonymised and drawn from documented work types in Gharib Gulf's operations history.
Before
Wellhead service records were maintained on paper forms. Condition assessments, lubrication logs and pressure-test results were filed separately, making it difficult to confirm whether a wellhead was ready for production operations or a planned workover.
After
Each wellhead is registered as a structured digital asset. Preventive-maintenance schedules, function-test results, lubrication records and pressure-test evidence are linked to the asset record. Supervisors can confirm wellhead readiness and identify outstanding work before a workover crew mobilises.
Structured pre-workover records reduce unplanned rig waiting time and support confident production-readiness confirmation.
Before
Valves across a field were replaced on a reactive basis when failures occurred, with no structured history records per valve. Without individual valve tags or service logs, it was difficult to distinguish a valve that had received scheduled maintenance from one that had not been serviced in years.
After
Each valve is assigned a unique tag number and a digital history record covering commissioning, scheduled PM cycles, corrective actions, sealant injections and pressure tests. Overdue valves are flagged automatically. Condition C valves are tracked through refurbishment and return to service.
Valve service history replaces reactive replacement decisions with evidence-based maintenance planning, reducing unnecessary procurement.
Before
Pump service activities were recorded in field notebooks or daily reports. When a pump fault occurred, technicians had limited access to previous service records, making root-cause analysis time-consuming and dependent on individual memory.
After
Pump assets carry a full digital service history including installation records, vibration observations, seal replacements, alignment checks and corrective findings. Field technicians access the asset record on-site. Recurring faults are visible across the service history, supporting targeted corrective action.
Accessible service history reduces diagnostic time and supports evidence-based decisions on repair versus replacement.
Before
Pipeline valve maintenance and pigging activities were documented through separate paper-based reports. Before-and-after pressure readings were recorded on site forms that were later transcribed, creating a risk of data loss between field execution and the final client report.
After
Pipeline assets and valve systems are registered with unique identifiers. Field teams record before-and-after pressure readings, pigging observations and valve condition data directly in the work order. Evidence is attached at the point of capture and linked to the asset record before supervisor review.
Captured before-and-after field data reaches the client report without manual transcription, reducing errors and improving report turnaround.
Before
Preventive maintenance campaigns across multiple wells or assets were planned in spreadsheets and tracked through daily progress emails. It was difficult to confirm which assets had been completed, which were outstanding and whether all required evidence had been collected for each activity.
After
Campaign work orders are created for each asset in scope. Progress is visible in real time — completed, in-progress and outstanding activities are tracked against the campaign schedule. Evidence completeness is checked before any activity is marked closed.
Campaign progress is visible to supervisors and management without waiting for daily status calls or manual consolidation of field reports.
Before
Emergency valve failures and unplanned shutdowns required rapid mobilisation with limited access to valve history or previous repair records. Temporary fixes were applied in the field without a structured process for documenting the action taken or submitting a permanent solution procedure.
After
Emergency work orders are raised with the asset's full service history available to the responding team. Actions taken, sealant quantities, parts used and findings are recorded in the work order. Temporary solutions are flagged for follow-up, and a permanent procedure can be attached before the record is closed.
Emergency response is supported by asset history, and every intervention — including temporary fixes — becomes part of the permanent maintenance record.
Before
Valves and wellhead components sent to the workshop for refurbishment were tracked informally. The connection between a component's field history, its workshop repair scope and its return-to-service condition was not consistently documented in a single accessible record.
After
Workshop jobs are linked to the originating asset record. Repair scope, machining actions, parts replaced, inspection results and return-to-service condition are recorded against the same asset. When the component is reinstalled in the field, the workshop record becomes part of its continuous service history.
Workshop refurbishment is traceable from field removal through repair to reinstallation, supporting asset lifecycle management and audit readiness.
Before
Wind turbine maintenance activities were coordinated through separate work sheets and verbal handovers between field crews and supervisors. Photographic evidence of completed tasks was collected on personal devices and shared informally, with no structured link to the specific asset or work order.
After
Turbine assets are registered with technical specifications, location records and service history. Work orders for scheduled and corrective maintenance are assigned to field crews. Before-and-after photographs, checklist completions and findings are attached to the work order and linked to the turbine asset record.
Turbine maintenance evidence is structured and traceable, supporting warranty boundary compliance and client reporting within the agreed service scope.
Before
Separator and vessel inspection results — including visual, penetrant and ultrasonic testing findings — were recorded on paper forms and submitted as standalone reports. Linking a current inspection finding to a previous inspection result required manual searching through archived paper records.
After
Each inspected asset carries a digital inspection history. NDT findings, condition ratings, photographs and recommendations are recorded against the asset record. Inspectors and supervisors can review previous findings before starting a new inspection, enabling trend identification and targeted follow-up.
Inspection history is accessible at the asset level, enabling condition trend analysis and supporting informed decisions on repair, monitoring or replacement.
Before
Managing simultaneous maintenance contracts across multiple field locations required separate reporting streams for each site. Consolidating progress, outstanding work and evidence completeness into a single client report was a manual process that delayed reporting and made cross-site comparisons difficult.
After
Each site operates within its own configured workspace under the same contract. Management and supervisors have a consolidated view across all sites — work-order status, evidence completeness and outstanding items — without waiting for individual site reports to be compiled and submitted.
Multi-site contract visibility is available in real time, supporting proactive management of resources, priorities and client reporting obligations across all locations.
Workflows are configured according to each contract. These scenarios do not suggest that all modules are already deployed for every client, and do not expose confidential operational data.
Field Execution Screen — Illustrative
Values are illustrative.
Mobile Field Execution
Responsive field screens support on-site teams to record completed work, evidence and findings and submit for review.
Reporting
Operations Dashboard — Illustrative
Work Orders Open
24
Completed This Month
67
Evidence Complete
89%
Open Findings
11
Assets Covered
142
Pending Approval
8
Service History Records
1,240
Reports Generated
18
Dashboard values shown on the public website are illustrative or anonymized and do not expose client operational data.
Implementation Approach
Review existing asset data, maintenance scope, operational requirements and contract obligations to define the configuration baseline.
Configure workflows, asset types, checklists, approval chains and role-based access according to the agreed operational scope.
Deploy one complete operational workflow in a controlled pilot to validate configuration, evidence requirements and reporting outputs.
Review pilot outcomes, complete team training and proceed with the agreed rollout according to contract milestones and change-control process.
A pilot can be used to validate one complete operational workflow while the next workflow is designed within the agreed scope. Additional implementation remains subject to the approved contract, milestones and change-control process.
Checklist Workflows
Checklists in MaintTrack PRO are not static forms — they are live operational records linked to specific assets, work orders and field teams, with a complete evidence trail from definition through to approval.
Supervisors or administrators define checklist templates for each asset type or activity — valve inspection, wellhead maintenance, rotating equipment service — with required items, acceptance criteria and evidence requirements.
Each checklist is linked to a specific work order, asset and assigned technician. The field team receives the checklist as part of their work package with clear scope and due date.
Technicians complete each checklist item on-site, recording observations, measurements, findings and attaching photographic evidence and location records to individual items.
Any defect, anomaly or non-conformance identified during the checklist is recorded as a finding with severity classification, recommended action and photographic evidence.
The supervisor reviews completed checklist items, validates evidence quality, confirms findings are properly recorded and either approves the checklist or returns it for correction.
Approved checklists become permanent operational records linked to the asset history. Completion rates, findings and evidence status feed directly into management dashboards and client reports.
The example below illustrates how a typical valve maintenance checklist appears in MaintTrack PRO — with per-item status and evidence tracking. Values are illustrative.
Actual checklists reflect the contract scope and specific asset requirements. Templates are configured per contract.
Valve Maintenance Checklist — Illustrative
WO-2024-0118Values are illustrative and do not reflect actual operational data.
Asset Tracking Module
Everything in MaintTrack PRO begins with a controlled asset record. From first registration through to the latest service, the system maintains a complete and auditable history for every asset within the contract scope.
Each asset is registered with a unique identifier, asset type, manufacturer, model, installation date, location and technical specifications. The registry is the single source of truth for all maintenance activity.
Asset location is recorded at registration and updated when assets are moved or relocated. Field activities capture GPS-supported location records that are linked to the asset history.
Asset operational status — active, under maintenance, out of service, decommissioned — is maintained in real time as work orders are opened, executed and closed.
Every work order, inspection, finding, corrective action and approval is permanently linked to the asset record, building a complete and auditable service history from first registration.
Preventive maintenance schedules are defined per asset type and linked to the asset registry. Due dates, overdue alerts and completion tracking are managed at the asset level.
Defects and service issues identified during inspections or maintenance are recorded against the asset and tracked through to corrective action and resolution.

GPS-Supported Asset Overview — illustrative data, does not reflect actual operational data.
Asset Record — Illustrative
Values are illustrative and do not reflect actual operational data.
In field maintenance operations, the absence of a controlled asset record means service history is fragmented, missing or dependent on individual memory. MaintTrack PRO ensures every activity — from routine inspection to emergency repair — is linked to the correct asset and retrievable.
Compliance Integration
Field maintenance operations work within compliance and safety requirements. MaintTrack PRO supports these requirements by connecting documentation, evidence and approvals to every field activity.
Work orders can be structured to require permit-to-work reference numbers and documentation before field execution begins. The permit reference is recorded in the work order and linked to the activity record.
Safety observations, toolbox talk records, risk assessment references and HSE non-conformances can be captured within the work order and linked to the asset and activity record.
Every field activity generates a structured evidence trail: GPS records, timestamped photographs, completed checklists, technician notes, findings and supervisor approvals — all linked to the work order and asset.
Operational records are structured and searchable by asset, date range, work type, technician and approval status. Client or third-party auditors can review authorized records within the agreed scope.
Work orders follow a defined approval chain from field completion through supervisor review to final closeout. No record is treated as complete until all required approvals are in place.
Procedures, method statements, technical drawings and reference documents can be attached to work orders and checklists, ensuring field teams work from the correct and current documentation.
Compliance Evidence Flow — Work Order to Archive
Note: Specific compliance requirements — including permit-to-work and HSE documentation — depend on the applicable contract and client requirements. MaintTrack PRO is configured to support these requirements according to the agreed scope.
Case Study
MaintTrack PRO's capabilities are grounded in documented field experience spanning 2001 to 2021. The cases below reflect actual work patterns from the recorded contracts history — with client names anonymized in accordance with privacy policy.
20+
Years of documented field operations
100+
Contracts and projects on record
6
Countries with documented engagements
15+
Client organizations served
2001 – 2021 (20 years, 12 documented contracts)
The longest continuously documented client relationship in the contracts history. Annual contracts renewed across two decades.
2002 – 2021 (11 documented contracts)
Continuous engagement from 2002 through 2021 covering both offshore platform and onshore wellhead maintenance.
2001 – 2015 (10 documented contracts, 2 locations)
Contracts covered two separate field locations simultaneously, with annual renewal from 2007 through 2015.
2013 – 2020 (6 documented contracts)
Recurring annual contracts across seven years covering valve maintenance at Red Sea onshore locations.
2006 – 2018 (4 documented contracts)
Contracts spanning 12 years with a gap between 2010 and 2015, then renewed through 2018.
2015 – 2017 (3 documented contracts)
Three consecutive annual contracts covering wellhead and pipeline valve maintenance at Red Sea onshore fields.
Documented International Engagements
Libya
Wellhead X-Mass tree preventive maintenance — Gailo-59 Fields (2013)
Yemen
Wellhead X-Mass tree routine and non-routine maintenance — Kharrir Block-10 (2014)
Kurdistan Region
Wellhead preventive maintenance — Khurmala Field, multiple wells (2014)
All cases are based on the documented contracts and projects history (2001–2021). Client names are anonymized. No contract values, specific operational statistics or confidential information are disclosed. Figures in this section reflect documented contract counts only.
Practical answers on scope, roles, field execution, reporting, and contract configuration.
Talk to Gharib Gulf about connecting asset records, field execution, evidence, approvals and reporting within a controlled MaintTrack PRO workflow.
MaintTrack PRO supports Gharib Gulf's digitally managed field-service delivery. Platform availability, configuration and functionality depend on the applicable contract and authorised client scope.